"Intellectually neutered." A great phrase. No way to interpret
that as a compliment.
That is how Will Cain of the Blaze recently described journalists on CNN’s 'Reliable Sources.'
Will also dismissed our news gatherers as "shallow
theater critics."
Evidence of this:
according to polls, most do not know what the 'sequester' is or its
effects, but we know that each party blames the other for it. More
evidence: Some may actually have believed
it was inevitable. Still more: We
don't know what Marco Rubio said after the SOTU, but we know he was
thirsty. A bit more: much attention paid to Obama confusing
Star Wars and Star Trek. Mind
melds were Vulcan. All school
children should have learned that in first grade. (Maybe just my kids learned that in first grade.) Not much attention paid to actual effects of, well, the sequester.
It is so easy to analyze what doesn't matter. How else could Joan Rivers justify
making a living critiquing clothing at the Oscars when her sole expertise comes
from 50+ years as a comedienne?
Another question:
why call the budget cut a 'sequester?" Was our government depending on the "kardashianism"
of our media in the hope that the public would hear a three syllable, nine
letter word and tune out? Thanks
to Will Cain, among others, for giving us the term "Kardashianism."
Maybe we get what we want. Actually trending recently: Britney Spear's shopping list. Trending as I write this: Paul
McCartney arrived at his daughter’s show late. Trying to sleep now will be hopeless.
By the way, is there a need to know the difference between a
Kardashian and a Snooki? Is there a difference? I am sure there is a newly neutered news correspondent covering this important issue.
